Sale!

Pearsons Federal Taxation 2017 Comprehensive 30th Edition Pope Test Bank

Name: Pearsons Federal Taxation 2017 Comprehensive 30th Edition Pope Test Bank
SKU: 18473
Price: 26.99 USD
Availability: InStock

Original price was: $50.00.Current price is: $26.99.

Pearsons Federal Taxation 2017 Comprehensive 30th Edition Pope Test Bank.

Download sample

Categories: Accounting, Test Bank Tags: 30th Edition, Anderson, Pearsons Federal Taxation 2017 Comprehensive, Pope, Rupert, Test Bank

Description

This is completed downloadable of Pearsons Federal Taxation 2017 Comprehensive 30th Edition Pope Test Bank

Product Details:

ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0134420640
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0134420646
Author: Thomas R. Pope (Author), Timothy J. Rupert (Author), Kenneth E. Anderson (Author)

The Rupert/Pope/Anderson series is unsurpassed in blending technical aspects of the most recent federal taxation mandates with maximum readability and relevance for readers. Containing strong pedagogical tools that enable readers to apply tax principles within the text to real-life situations, and tax information from 2015 and early 2016, Pearson’s Federal Taxation 2017 Comprehensive, Thirtieth Edition provides a better learning experience.

Table of Content:

Chapter 1C;

Step 1 of 2

Tax research is the process of solving the problems related to tax by applying the tax law relevant to the client. Tax research is also performed to understand the tax consequences of a transaction.

Step 2 of 2

A closed-fact situation is a situation in which a fact has already happened. In such a situation, a tax advisor analyzes the facts that are happened, and determines proper tax treatments.

On the contrary, an open-fact situation is a situation in which a fact does not happen for the time being. In such a situation, a tax advisor plans for the facts, shapes the facts that might be happen in the future, and hence produces desirable tax results.

Chapter 1l

Step 1 of 1

In 1895, by the United States Constitution, a direct tax should be apportioned among different states proportional to states’ populations.

At that time, the United States viewed the income tax as a direct tax, and hence the income tax should be apportioned among different states proportional to states’ populations, which is nether practical nor feasible to administer. The reason is that the application of this type of tax system requires individual taxpayers would be applied different rates of tax depending on their states of residence. So, the Supreme Court treated the income tax to be unconstitutional in 1895.